The Toronto Maple Leafs appear to be on the brink of a significant blunder, and if the circulating rumors are accurate, it will undoubtedly be a regrettable decision. The general manager, Brad Treliving, finds himself in a precarious position, with his former team, the Calgary Flames, facing a dire situation and the Maple Leafs not performing much better.
Despite achieving satisfactory to good results this season, the Leafs are far from the powerhouse they were anticipated to be. In comparison to the previous season, they seem like a parody of their former selves. The uncertainty of their playoff appearance looms large, despite notable performances from Auston Matthews and William Nylander, both approaching MVP levels. A pivotal factor contributing to their struggles is Treliving’s extravagant squandering of $20 million in cap space during one of the NHL’s most ill-fated summer spending sprees.
Now, let’s delve into the specific issue surrounding William Nylander. The decision to grant a substantial extension to the 28-year-old forward, who is currently enjoying a career-best year, is poised to be an obvious misstep. A contract spanning eight years will extend Nylander’s tenure to 36, increasing the likelihood of declining performance as he approaches and surpasses 30—a trend frequently observed with such extended contracts.
While top-tier players like Sidney Crosby tend to maintain their excellence throughout their careers, the same cannot be guaranteed for others. Nylander, being more one-dimensional compared to players like Mitch Marner, raises questions about the wisdom of investing heavily in him. Nylander lacks the defensive prowess and versatility of a center, making him more of a luxury than a necessity.
Despite Nylander’s undeniable talent, committing such a substantial investment during the peak of his powers is questionable. Instead, considering the Leafs’ forward-heavy lineup and the deficiency in top-tier defensemen, Nylander could serve as a valuable trade asset. The team’s imbalance, with strength in offense and weakness on the blue line, makes a heavy investment in Nylander seem imprudent.
The Leafs have previously demonstrated success with a top-heavy roster and strategic value-based decisions, even amidst challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic. With the salary cap set to rise, they can feasibly compete with a stars-and-scrubs lineup, which is considered optimal in a cap-constrained league. However, committing significant resources to Nylander, especially at this crucial juncture, goes against this prudent approach.
What compounds the issue is the delay in addressing this concern. The Leafs might find themselves in a position where they have limited leverage in trade negotiations if they choose to part ways with Nylander mid-season. Ideally, this decision should have been made during the summer, allowing the team to negotiate from a position of strength.
Adding to the skepticism is Treliving’s track record, specifically his previous signings of Nazem Kadri and Jon Huberdeau to comparable deals at similar ages. It raises doubts about whether lessons have been learned from past mistakes.
In conclusion, the Maple Leafs are at risk of making a colossal mistake by heavily investing in Nylander at this juncture. The combination of Nylander’s age, playing style, and the team’s roster dynamics suggests that a more prudent approach, perhaps exploring a trade while his value is at its peak, would be a wiser course of action.
Leave a Reply